Rule Change To Allow The Original Poster More Control Of Their Own Thread!!!! VOTE NOW!!!!!

Do you wish to allow members to have more control of their own Posts by changing the rules?

  • Change The Rules

    Votes: 16 28.1%
  • Do Not Change The Rules

    Votes: 40 70.2%
  • I Do Not Care

    Votes: 1 1.8%

  • Total voters
    57
Status
Not open for further replies.

Kyurious14U

Zooville Settler
The proposed rule change in the Porn section would allow the Original Poster to dictate within their own thread whom can reply or not. Whom to remove, recategorize, or allow to reply and participate no matter that members sex, gender, or identity. This will allow the OP to have full control of their post as far as whom is allowed to participate, be more inclusive (or not), completely within their control of their own thread.

The Proposed rule change is as follows:

1. Let people of any gender post in any section regardless of the section's gender categorization and leave the post there until the OP reports it if they do not like it.
2. If the OP has been inactive for 12 months since their last post and can not be contacted, only then can a mod take control of the thread and move or remove the post/thread based on a report from an active member.

@ZTHorse
 
It it just me or is title case just hard to read?

Proposed rule change: Allow the OP more control of their own thread!

Much better, not?

Now, on-topic:

I think this is a horrible idea.
We don't need dick pics in the female section, and we don't need titties / pussy in the male section. We don't need ftm content in the male section, or mtf in the female section, we have a trans section specifically for that.
We have those sections for a reason, and plenty of users are uncomfortable seeing such content, and thus only visit the sections that align with their interests.

This will allow the OP to have full control of their post as far as whom is allowed to participate, be more inclusive (or not), completely within their control of their own thread.
I'm afraid this will just result in complete anarchy.
"I don't like your opinion so you're not allowed to participate"
Yikes.
 
Last edited:
It it just me or is title case just hard to read?

Proposed rule change: Allow the OP more control of their own thread!

Much better, not?
In this case it might run contrary to what the OP wishes for regarding control about the own threads. But yes, it is an unclear title description.

Explanation in the OPs post is straight to the point, fortunately.
 
How I interpret this Proposed Rule Change: Anything goes anywhere, Free For All
it gives the Post originator the admin ability to police their own thread which will allow them to be inclusive of others or not. To stifle off topic debates before they get started. It will allow YOU, the ability to keep YOUR post focused where YOU want it.
 
It it just me or is title case just hard to read?

Proposed rule change: Allow the OP more control of their own thread!

Much better, not?

Now, on-topic:

I think this is a horrible idea.
We don't need dick pics in the female section, and we don't need titties / pussy in the male section. We don't need ftm content in the male section, or mtf in the female section, we have a trans section specifically for that.
We have those sections for a reason, and plenty of users are uncomfortable seeing such content, and thus only visit the sections that align with their interests.


I'm afraid this will just result in complete anarchy.
"I don't like your opinion so you're not allowed to participate"
Yikes.
I can see your point, but does the OP not have the right to keep unwanted opinions off of their thread. If the opinionated reply deem it necessary, they can always post a separate thread with their own opinion.
 
No it does not. It gives them the ability to report what they do not like to mods.
Users will never be able to delete posts of other people even in their threads. Only mods can do that.
And we are not going to make everybody a moderator. :D
They can report tot he mod for removal...themselves...and if they dont want it removed they can choose to keep it...themselves... therefor they may not be the ones actually removing but they can request it be removed just as they can make the decision to NOT request it be removed.
 
They can report tot he mod for removal...themselves...and if they dont want it removed they can choose to keep it...themselves... therefor they may not be the ones actually removing but they can request it be removed just as they can make the decision to NOT request it be removed.
So they can just do that. But many choose to not do that and complain we don't do anything.
 
FTM piping up in here... I do not care, because first and foremost this is a zoo forum. Not everyone is going to like the same content. Not everyone is comfortable or attracted to certain body types, biological sexes, genders, species, etc. And that's okay. Preferences exist. Some people don't want to see trans content, and that's OKAY! Just like some people don't want to see dog content or horse content. It's ALL OKAY.

I'm really getting tired of the trans community trying to dictate how people should feel about transgender bodies. It's a two way street. I see this as an unnecessary temper tantrum that's only going to do more harm to the trans community and it's fight to gain acceptance and tolerance. This is the type of shit that makes my education efforts 1000 times harder. Please... Stop.

We have a section dedicated to us. It is a good compromise that includes us, while also respecting the preferences of others. This isn't like the bathroom battle, since nothing is being witnessed or viewed, just go do your business and get out like everyone else. But here, this forum has accepted that we exist, while also accepting that it's not everyone's cup of tea. And that's okay. If you don't like how a place is run, then... don't stay.

I have a ton of issues with a lot of the opinions shared on this forum, but I don't go looking for it. People can accept that we exist without having to be exposed to every aspect. Respect a forum's rules, or just don't be a part of it. Having civil discussion about the rules is one thing, it's another to go completely off the walls over them and try to get drastic changes that just alienates literally everyone, myself and other trans individuals. In the end, this is a forum, and when you make a post, you're going to get opinions that you don't like. If it's something against the rules, report it. If not, ignore it or block that user and move on.

Now, can there be improvements? Sure. Could the trans exclusive forums be made a subsection of the male/female areas? Sure. But I'm not about to piss and moan and rock a boat that isn't even mine if it isn't done to my liking. Please, stop making the trans community look bad, and understand that not every place has to bend to transgender wants and needs. The simple fact of the matter, we are still trans, and we still have differences that not everyone enjoys or wants to see. And again, that's okay. There's a space for us when the staff didn't even have to bother including us at all. Would I like to see the transgender area organized better? Yes. But we all need to pick our battles more wisely, because this shit ain't it.
 
I can see your point, but does the OP not have the right to keep unwanted opinions off of their thread. If the opinionated reply deem it necessary, they can always post a separate thread with their own opinion.
No, they do not have that right. In fact, they have *NO RIGHTS WHATSOEVER* (well, unless they're ZTHorse or SloppyTaco - the owners/operators of this forum). If someone doesn't want their post to get whatever response THE READER feels appropriate, then they should do one of two things: Keep their mouth shut (AKA "Don't post in the first place") or go start a blog or similar, and post away in your own private echo-chamber.
 
It is comical how the use of one word has lit afire such drum beating by the crowd... R-I-G-H-T-S... LMAO....jump on that low lying fruit I left there for you....LOL
 
The dumpster fire thread is over there..... NOT here....
I'll let the mods be the judge of that. You've already demonstrated that you completely lack the objectivity needed to make that decision.

(Which doesn't even begin to consider the fact that if you think THAT was "dumpster" material, you're even thinner-skinned than I already thought - you're essentially screaming "He punched me at least 10 times", when, at best, you got a feather waved in your general direction by someone standing at the other end of a football field. Behavior that's pretty typical for knee-jerk wannabe SJWs. Which reminds me - when are you due to start REEEEEEEEEEEEEing? I ask only so I can put in the earplugs ahead of time in order to avoid sustaining hearing damage.)
 
I'll let the mods be the judge of that. You've already demonstrated that you completely lack the objectivity needed to make that decision.

(Which doesn't even begin to consider the fact that if you think THAT was "dumpster" material, you're even thinner-skinned than I already thought - you're essentially screaming "He punched me at least 10 times", when, at best, you got a feather waved in your general direction by someone standing at the other end of a football field. Behavior that's pretty typical for knee-jerk wannabe SJWs. Which reminds me - when are you due to start REEEEEEEEEEEEEing? I ask only so I can put in the earplugs ahead of time in order to avoid sustaining hearing damage.)
Just trying to keep the subject matter at the center of this thread and not your ego, or rantings, or even your tears... so just take a seat and pick up your pacifier...
 
Just trying to keep the subject matter at the center of this thread and not your ego, or rantings, or even your tears... so just take a seat and pick up your pacifier...
Nice attempt. Weren't you the one offering advice about where the dumpster fire thread is? You might consider the idea of renting a front-end loader to drag the sawmill out of your own eye before you start trying to check mine for dust motes.

Meanwhile, looks like your brilliant idea is being voted down pretty close to 2:1 so far. Major surprise... not. Truly warms the cockles of the lump of charcoal some folks claim passes for my heart to see the population of this wonderful little annex of Sodom show some sense :)
 
Nice attempt. Weren't you the one offering advice about where the dumpster fire thread is? You might consider the idea of renting a front-end loader to drag the sawmill out of your own eye before you start trying to check mine for dust motes.

Meanwhile, looks like your brilliant idea is being voted down pretty close to 2:1 so far. Major surprise... not. Truly warms the cockles of the lump of charcoal some folks claim passes for my heart to see the population of this wonderful little annex of Sodom show some sense :)
No advice, stating what the mod above had underscored. It's shocking how threatened you feel, if for some reason it did garner the popular vote. which would be inconsequential as is clear herein.
 
No advice, stating what the mod above had underscored. It's shocking how threatened you feel, if for some reason it did garner the popular vote. which would be inconsequential as is clear herein.

Threatened? Wow... You're just bound and determined to be a perfect illustration of *EVERY ONE* of the tropes that make your kind the insufferable laughingstocks they are to those who can actually think coherently, aincha? What are you doing? Looking at a sheet for the next one you should spew, then putting a checkmark next to it?

Hmmm... closing in on 3:1 against. Y'know, a rational person would probably be making the concession phone-call about now.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top