Post Some Pics of Your Partners

Well yes, it could even be gone next week. We can talk about the various ways it can go too...we can talk about FEMA suspending the constitution, with no federal law, code, or procedure in place to reimplement it, and then have to feel with NWO deep-state martial law from state and municipality now having free reign to do whatever they wanted. We can talk about computers and robots replacing humans and create a theory on how they plan to get into the legal field and instantly calculate our fates. We can talk about the new world hackers and anonymous and how they will supposedly rule the internet and cyber security. We can talk about facial recognition to identify people's names and addresses online. We can talk about ww3, the 3rd anti-christ, the false prophet, Dajjal, Mabus, Nostradamus, "Jewish "conspiracy theories"", and so one. All of which are always a real possibility and threat.

As for the internet serving as legal protection from prosecution, I'm not sure where that came up at here in this thread, but I don't believe the internet serves as legal protection at all. Most states in the US only have laws on the actual act, several have laws on meeting up with intent of beastiality, outside of that there's no crimes. Beastiality is so common, judges, police officers, and detectives even do it. No one and no department is going to waste their time setting up a police entrapment scenario that would be tossed out the window and laughed at by a judge, no one's going to waste money and resources on having hundreds of thousands of zoos stalked for meetups, or what in most cases become potential possible meetups that the other person gets too scared to actually show up.

The minute we become slaves to the system is the moment it gets over thrown. This is not a dictatorship, and our country new age socialist path is about to make it just that.
??? Um I just meant the second anybody zoo or not puts anything online control of that thing is lost. Taking it back from the internets grasp is very hard. So people who have things to lose such as a lot of zoos do need to just be careful what they share publicly. The main thread here is not from law enforcement, but rather from antis who have nothing better to do with their time than try and dox zoos for the fun of it. Anyone is welcome to post what ever personal information or pics they like within the site rules, but sometime actions have consequences, that is all.
 
??? Um I just meant the second anybody zoo or not puts anything online control of that thing is lost. Taking it back from the internets grasp is very hard. So people who have things to lose such as a lot of zoos do need to just be careful what they share publicly. The main thread here is not from law enforcement, but rather from antis who have nothing better to do with their time than try and dox zoos for the fun of it. Anyone is welcome to post what ever personal information or pics they like within the site rules, but sometime actions have consequences, that is all.
Yes, I understand. My goal is to not foster insecurity and fear, but rather empower zoos for who they are, and that includes encouraging them to be open and themselves. If everyone did so, there would be no legal ramifications or outings from anti-zoos in non-law-enforvement. But yet that is a matter of personal choice that each person must decide for themselves.
 
Yes, I understand. My goal is to not foster insecurity and fear, but rather empower zoos for who they are, and that includes encouraging them to be open and themselves. If everyone did so, there would be no legal ramifications or outings from anti-zoos in non-law-enforvement. But yet that is a matter of personal choice that each person must decide for themselves.
Yes that is a nice goal, and I do applaud it in spirit. But in the current social climate in far to many countries around the world being to open if you aren't prepared for the potential damage can still be a dangerous thing. This is the biggest zoo site in the western world if not on the planet. It is a magnet for anyone who wants to do an individual or the community harm. I mean look at the Ddos attacks here in the last few month, do you know how much money that must have cost someone to do, we have people who really don't like us. So if a little thought about what we reveal to the world saves someone's life from being wrecked or anything happening to their beloved animal(s) is that so unreasonable. Be as open as you like with family and friends people you trust. just take care online and I'm not just talking about zoo things, but zoo is the matter at hand here. Programs exist that can have a human face imported into them and then an AI scans the net for possible matches.

I'm not saying any of this to scare people 9 out of 10 people will never have any problem if they put their face on here, but that 1 person might have someone report them to the authorities or have their dog "rescued from the perverted person, who would abuse them by having sex with them." They might lose there job if the business owner, take exception to the idea of a zoo on the payroll, and a host of other minor or major things that could range from unpleasant to life destroying. At the end of the day prevention is better than regret. So taking simple precautions to protect the ones we love, is how I feel to be most prudent; and until society changes and zoo is better understood and accepted by people you have very little chance of changing my mind on this matter. I sincerely wish you and jack never have any problems if you prefer to take a different path in life. Peace out Dude.

Now can we get back to the cute pics of those 4 leggers we love and here about what amazing animals they are and what they get up to.
 
Yes that is a nice goal, and I do applaud it in spirit. But in the current social climate in far to many countries around the world being to open if you aren't prepared for the potential damage can still be a dangerous thing. This is the biggest zoo site in the western world if not on the planet. It is a magnet for anyone who wants to do an individual or the community harm. I mean look at the Ddos attacks here in the last few month, do you know how much money that must have cost someone to do, we have people who really don't like us. So if a little thought about what we reveal to the world saves someone's life from being wrecked or anything happening to their beloved animal(s) is that so unreasonable. Be as open as you like with family and friends people you trust. just take care online and I'm not just talking about zoo things, but zoo is the matter at hand here. Programs exist that can have a human face imported into them and then an AI scans the net for possible matches.

I'm not saying any of this to scare people 9 out of 10 people will never have any problem if they put their face on here, but that 1 person might have someone report them to the authorities or have their dog "rescued from the perverted person, who would abuse them by having sex with them." They might lose there job if the business owner, take exception to the idea of a zoo on the payroll, and a host of other minor or major things that could range from unpleasant to life destroying. At the end of the day prevention is better than regret. So taking simple precautions to protect the ones we love, is how I feel to be most prudent; and until society changes and zoo is better understood and accepted by people you have very little chance of changing my mind on this matter. I sincerely wish you and jack never have any problems if you prefer to take a different path in life. Peace out Dude.

Now can we get back to the cute pics of those 4 leggers we love and here about what amazing animals they are and what they get up to.
I totally understand and agree. I was simply hinting to the fact that each person's situation may be different. Without jumping to conclusions, the poster may very well be D.C. legal and knows he isn't up for any potential harm if others found out. People like myself who are retired and self employed have nothing to fear from employers. I've removed a cop and a judge before because they thought they could do whatever they wanted. If a cop walked up to me, I'd inform him he had no warrant, no probable cause, no reasonable suspicion, alno due process of law, and that he was engaging in criminal harassment and violating my 9th and 14th amendments, and that if he did not leave immediately that I would go to the courthouse and file a lawsuit and seek criminal charges on him and his PD.

In the US, too many people forget that they still have rights and neglect to apply them. In other countries it may be a very different situation. I don't care who knows I'm a zoo, I'm open about it in real life, but if I'm ever fucked with or if any one messes with my dog, I'll make sure it is their life that is utterly destroyed through the court system, and let's hope Jack doesn't eat a few of his fingers in the process.

All I'm saying is that those that are open about it in person or online know the consequences, consciously do so, and have nothing to fear from the community, work, or the system. That doesn't apply to everyone, but the ones that are open zoos are protected...no one is stupid enough to do so with knowing their life would be harmed.
 
I totally understand and agree. I was simply hinting to the fact that each person's situation may be different. Without jumping to conclusions, the poster may very well be D.C. legal and knows he isn't up for any potential harm if others found out. People like myself who are retired and self employed have nothing to fear from employers. I've removed a cop and a judge before because they thought they could do whatever they wanted. If a cop walked up to me, I'd inform him he had no warrant, no probable cause, no reasonable suspicion, alno due process of law, and that he was engaging in criminal harassment and violating my 9th and 14th amendments, and that if he did not leave immediately that I would go to the courthouse and file a lawsuit and seek criminal charges on him and his PD.

In the US, too many people forget that they still have rights and neglect to apply them. In other countries it may be a very different situation. I don't care who knows I'm a zoo, I'm open about it in real life, but if I'm ever fucked with or if any one messes with my dog, I'll make sure it is their life that is utterly destroyed through the court system, and let's hope Jack doesn't eat a few of his fingers in the process.

All I'm saying is that those that are open about it in person or online know the consequences, consciously do so, and have nothing to fear from the community, work, or the system. That doesn't apply to everyone, but the ones that are open zoos are protected...no one is stupid enough to do so with knowing their life would be harmed.
The member who's post started this discussion had been a member for less than 24 hours at the time. New people often do make oversights and lapses in judgement, particularly if they're excited about finding a community that shares there love for something where they can feel accepted or at home, that may or may not be the case this time. I don't go and read everybody's profiles who's post I respond to. If they are legally protected that's great, although the fact laws apply differently to one group of people than other people is concerning to me.
However when I looked into it a tiny bit this is what I found:
"Federal Legislation. Bestiality has been a crime at the federal level since the 1950′s under the United States Armed Forces Code. The Code states that individuals who engage in “unnatural carnal copulation with an animal” are guilty of bestiality and will be punished through court-martial [41].12 June 2022" That doesn't sound very legally protected to me.

But to say "no one is stupid enough to do so with knowing their life would be harmed." relies on two things people not making mistakes and people actually "knowing" of the risks they are taking. Most people on here do have something to lose, that something may be different from person to person. But the number of full open zoos in both real life and online is a tiny tiny number, compared to those that aren't. It's great you are, but it sounds like you have taken the journey and have the strength to take the bumps along the way. Not everyone is ready for that journey so helping them avoid accidentally taking that first step is important. If they know the risks and choose to take the step that's different.
 
The member who's post started this discussion had been a member for less than 24 hours at the time. New people often do make oversights and lapses in judgement, particularly if they're excited about finding a community that shares there love for something where they can feel accepted or at home, that may or may not be the case this time. I don't go and read everybody's profiles who's post I respond to. If they are legally protected that's great, although the fact laws apply differently to one group of people than other people is concerning to me.
However when I looked into it a tiny bit this is what I found:
"Federal Legislation. Bestiality has been a crime at the federal level since the 1950′s under the United States Armed Forces Code. The Code states that individuals who engage in “unnatural carnal copulation with an animal” are guilty of bestiality and will be punished through court-martial [41].12 June 2022" That doesn't sound very legally protected to me.

But to say "no one is stupid enough to do so with knowing their life would be harmed." relies on two things people not making mistakes and people actually "knowing" of the risks they are taking. Most people on here do have something to lose, that something may be different from person to person. But the number of full open zoos in both real life and online is a tiny tiny number, compared to those that aren't. It's great you are, but it sounds like you have taken the journey and have the strength to take the bumps along the way. Not everyone is ready for that journey so helping them avoid accidentally taking that first step is important. If they know the risks and choose to take the step that's different.
That may be true, but Congress no longer has legal authority over the Armed Forces. Congress put all that power and authority off on the District of Columbia about ten years after that federal legislation. Today, Congress only has direct power and authority over D.C. except for the seated President. Only D.C. and a seated President have direct legal authority over the Aed Forces, Congress no longer does, and only has jurisdiction over D.C. It's been that way in full since the 60s.

D.C. has not declared beastiality as a crime for any member whether inside or enlisted, or holding office or position outside of the district/"state". Now, in theory, each branch may or could induct their own rules, procedure, and consequences for it, but their is nothing Congress can legally do, as they no longer hold jurisdiction over the Armed Forces.
 
Have you ever tried to give a cat a bath with one arm? Ya. It turns into a wrestling match. I do file them down if he’s just laying down and in deep sleep
i regularly took my cat for "drags" and random baths. he eventually took to heeling while waling the block and sitting in tub.
 
It is not well known among general audiences, but breeders are very enthusiastic to get their hands on them. Very popular among breeders.
Here is the official site https://www.hangintreecowdog.net/

They originated in Texas, and breeders all over the Country are seeking to populate them.
They look like what we call a Texas Heeler around here (I had one for 17 years), except they're bigger and hell for rugged. I don't want to post pics of my boy here; he had very distinctive markings and there are tons of pictures elsewhere on the 'net.
 
Back
Top