• Zooville Critical Notice, For all Users!
  • User Permission and Privilege Changes (PMs and Forum Layout): Sept. 20th, 2025: Please read the following announcement: CLICK HERE!
  • Update, October 4th, 2025: The ability to create NEW groups in the social groups area of the forum has been disabled. Click the hyperlink in the notification above for more information.

No more human dick pics as profile pic

erphy said:
Resurrecting/adding here. While its not against the rules and such, just came to say that I think human genitals for avatars is dumb on a zoo site. I don't come here to see dick and pussy pics as I'm scrolling through forum posts. Being a zoo site, I welcome animal genitals of all kinds if that's what people want to do.

Like OK wow you have a big cock or nice vag and are so proud of it, go show it off in a dick/vag pic thread.
Click to expand...
I agree as I don't have much of an exhibit complex lol
 
erphy said:
I’m glad. But I also suggest you pick something for an avatar. The letter B is not memorable. But hey ok if you don’t your choice.
Click to expand...
I had another picture before but it was probably a little too revealing, it was a protogen version of my fursona so... Yeah
 
Blue_Furry said:
I had another picture before but it was probably a little too revealing, it was a protogen version of my fursona so... Yeah
Click to expand...
That's probably a wise decision. Usually it's not wise to mix zoophilia with with furrism due to the passionate anti-zoo sentiment that exists among many furries. Especially with the younger generation of furries. Hopefully you'll find yourself a nice replacement avatar for the one that you had previously. Perhaps you could even create yourself a unique "zoo-sona" character separate from your normal fursona.
 
dogandponyshow said:
maybe it’s just me but there’s something kinda unhinged about being disgusted by the human body
Click to expand...
I’m not disgusted , just I come to a zoo site to live in my experience as a zoo, if I wanted to embellish my sexuality with humans I will go to appropriate sites for that. Now human and zoo together stuff is A—OK of course.
 
erphy said:
I’m not disgusted , just I come to a zoo site to live in my experience as a zoo, if I wanted to embellish my sexuality with humans I will go to appropriate sites for that. Now human and zoo together stuff is A—OK of course.
Click to expand...
I was referring more to the original poster who seemed to be unable to refer to a human penis without some form of strange euphemistic insult.
 
dartel said:
YES!

Even. Fucking. GRINDR! Forbids. Nude. Profile. Photos!
Click to expand...
That’s because Apple doesn’t allow listings of any app that has publicly available NSFW content which means that if Grindr allowed public nudes they’d lose half their membership from being unavailable on iOS devices.

Speaking from experience, on any gay hookup app nude photos are allowed in private albums that you can share with people that you’re interested in.
 
FloofyNewfie said:
That's probably a wise decision. Usually it's not wise to mix zoophilia with with furrism due to the passionate anti-zoo sentiment that exists among many furries. Especially with the younger generation of furries. Hopefully you'll find yourself a nice replacement avatar for the one that you had previously. Perhaps you could even create yourself a unique "zoo-sona" character separate from your normal fursona.
Click to expand...
Thank you for your reply, its true that I was going to put myself in danger, and honestly I'm kinda glad to have changed it, and I think I'm gonna stick with the "B" for now xP
 
erphy said:
I’m not disgusted , just I come to a zoo site to live in my experience as a zoo, if I wanted to embellish my sexuality with humans I will go to appropriate sites for that. Now human and zoo together stuff is A—OK of course.
Click to expand...
This is a good argument. Though at the same time, one could have a profile picture of Superman, so why distinguish between the two?
 
pissyfart said:
This is a good argument. Though at the same time, one could have a profile picture of Superman, so why distinguish between the two?
Click to expand...
I have to explain what the difference is ? I mean the same reason you don’t see human genital images plastered all over in public, and why in nearly all places it is illegal to expose yourself in public. Human genital images evoke a sexual response or in some cases aversion in a majority of the population. If I was looking for cock or vag pics to give myself an arousal response I’d go look for them on purpose. Like visit a thread for them . Same goes for what I don’t want to see as cocks are not something I don't want to look at least most of the time unless they are involved in activities that attract me. So again on a zoo site I would expect zoo themed sexual pfps, not straight up human only genitalia. Of course non sexual or disgusting pfps of Superman are fine , I mean that’s a given.

edit : forgot the I don't in "don't want to look at". i really have to read my shit before hitting post...
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top