New Zoophilia Wiki Initiative - Apply to be a Writer.

ZTHorse said:
It will be the ZV mod team, and it is funded by zooville.org.
Click to expand...
I'm actually a Full stack web developer/software engineer. I was wondering if there was any way I could help out. I noticed some people asking for features and such for the site, I'm sure I could help with some of them.
 
For anyone still on the wiki, We had a visual editor previously which had some issues, and now the visual editor works. So you wouldn't have to use the source edit unless you want to. A few other pages were worked on plus some pages that were on wikipedia which are no longer there is being worked on.
 
If there's a DVM or Zoologist I'll partner up to write about physiology and emergency situations of human/species interactions.
 
ZTHorse said:
Hey everyone,

As we have heard and understand our position in the zoo community. We have been planning to launch a resource that will document our zoophile history, community, persons, and lifestyle in a format that is better suited to the general public. This initiative has long been planned and now we are ready to put forth the effort, time and cost in managing the official zoophilia wiki page for the whole world.

It is being funded by you whom have been generous, (Thank you Philanthropists) and had the giving spirit to fund ZooVille development. We are using a portion of the donation funds to host this wiki and now we are needing man-power to begin to fill this wiki up with all the knowledge of zoophilia we have.

This resource is a non-pornographic, strickly educational, and documentational wiki for the general public to learn about us.

We are opening up to 15 dedicated writer positions for the wiki. If you have previous wiki writing experience or tech experience, it would be greatly appreciated. If you are interested in helping the zoo community with article writing, please send me a PM.

The wiki is officially open at https://zoophilia.wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page

In deepest love,
ZTHorse

View attachment 107194

Edit; Current writers

@Appa Loosa
@Kynophile
@SigmatoZeta
@Ookami
@ZTHorse
@SteveL from Zeta-Verein
@FloofyNewfie
@underdoge
@DogMichael
@idugavgav
@Equinophile
@LeftFilly
@BojackFR
@QuantumHusky
Click to expand...
so cool thanks
 
I would like to register there.
At least one article zoo exclusivity needs update. :D
 
I just found out and am loving the content of Wiki Zoo. It's so hard to find articles and written works, there are some that permeate vaguely or exclusively in the Freudian perspective of the zoo categorized as perversion/fetishism.

I make myself available if you need researchers/writers (I have a background in psychology, psychoanalysis and attorney).
It made me very happy to know this work with references from our community. I dream that in the future we will have more bibliographic references and research for a better understanding of the zoo as a way of life.
 
One thing Id suggest is finding an overall editor for spelling and grammar, and give him the authority to actually edit.

If you are going to rep this as a world resource, you ought to be sure it LOOKS and READS like a resource. It should not look like it was written for the Disneyplus geepees.

Your target audience is not -- year-olds. Some of them have gone to college on post-grad levels; almost all have a HS diploma. The Wiki should draw that level of educated people in to use it as a resource, or it will be laughable, and thus unused. It doesn't have to be Descartes or Einstein, but it has to have a value beyond what can be found in an elementary school library.
..Doing things on a financial shoestring is one thing....Doing things on an education level of Grade School will not produce a resource, just a headache.
 
saddlebum66 said:
One thing Id suggest is finding an overall editor for spelling and grammar, and give him the authority to actually edit.

If you are going to rep this as a world resource, you ought to be sure it LOOKS and READS like a resource. It should not look like it was written for the Disneyplus geepees.

Your target audience is not -- year-olds. Some of them have gone to college on post-grad levels; almost all have a HS diploma. The Wiki should draw that level of educated people in to use it as a resource, or it will be laughable, and thus unused. It doesn't have to be Descartes or Einstein, but it has to have a value beyond what can be found in an elementary school library.
..Doing things on a financial shoestring is one thing....Doing things on an education level of Grade School will not produce a resource, just a headache.
Click to expand...
Sadly, there has been low activity for the ones that had an account to edit. Everyone that gets an account is approved to be an editor. We don't make them an account just to have it.
Currently, I'm working on re-organizing a few things, and fixing the Zooier than thou page as the episodes were listed wrong.

We're still looking for others who are interested in helping out, even if others who aren't editors spot something, feel free to bring it to us to look into.
I'm noticing it seems what needs to be looked at is the guides, as I've noticed more searches are obviously for "how to fuck a female dog"
IF some are thinking there's not many clicks, this graph shows there's thousands. Although, honestly feeling like its bots if anything.

1696529802142.png
1696529862088.png

Yes, I'm using Google but also use AWstats. This is only to see how many visitors come by search terms, pages that are viewed, and search queries.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top