New Zoophilia Wiki Initiative - Apply to be a Writer.

If you want to make something so bad. May be ask to apply. If a woman wants to apply and write something. It's always open.
Wolfia said:
No the gay guys can sink your zooship by themselves lol. There needs to be a separation between the "zoo community" and women's bestality & sexuality. The former is completely stupid and the latter has deep archaic and modern significance.
Click to expand...
 
Hi. Just found this place and would love to contribute. My name is Brit, also known in the beast community as britbritbeme2. I had the most popular beast blog on Tumblr with over 100k followers and know the history of beast, actresses, video companies, logo's, pictures etc. I've been into this for 17 years and have an external HD with over 1TB of beast content that I've compiled over my 17 years. I feel as if I can contribute greatly to the wiki as I am sometimes referred to as "the beast encyclopedia" anyways, hope you consider me.

Thanks!
Britbritbeme2
 
I hope you don't get a strange shiver when you're on too fever 😁🐾🌶️👌
 
is there interest on having multiple language versions of the articles, I'm willing to do the Portuguese version of the wiki articles. I can reliably translate from English and Spanish and from Portuguese/Spanish back to English if needed.
 
dogluver101 said:
If you want to make something so bad. May be ask to apply. If a woman wants to apply and write something. It's always open.
Click to expand...

I wonder how much editing would be done on posts made by women because for example it wouldn't follow the new 'zoophile community' group think. Or worse they get deleted due to the community orthodoxy being debunked by real world experience
 
I accidentally hit join just so you know I'm not trying to become a writer or anything, though I do like the idea of this forrum's growth.🐕🐴🐷🐮😸
 
the wiki is a great initiative. I personaly wish that it could also gather info on known people in the bestiality area: 'actors', producers and movies. Something a bit like IMDB or, closer, IAFD.
Not sure that is what people want but that would be awsome to have a huge list.
@ZTHorse: is that ok for you?
 
Grenouille said:
the wiki is a great initiative. I personaly wish that it could also gather info on known people in the bestiality area: 'actors', producers and movies. Something a bit like IMDB or, closer, IAFD.
Not sure that is what people want but that would be awsome to have a huge list.
@ZTHorse: is that ok for you?
Click to expand...
We have some info about actors, and need to flesh out some of the articles. (Like, all of them.) I don't know if we want to collect too much personal info about real people, though, unless it's all public stuff from online articles and such.
 
DogMichael said:
We have some info about actors, and need to flesh out some of the articles. (Like, all of them.) I don't know if we want to collect too much personal info about real people, though, unless it's all public stuff from online articles and such.
Click to expand...
Personal info shouldn't be more than vital stats you can find at IAFD + what kind of animal theperformer had sex with.
 
I dont like the idea about an "IMDB for zoo porn actors". You gotta remember the most damage and danger they have are from people outside of our community, not in it. Gathering that info would just make it easier for them
 
I wouldn't mind adding to the wiki. I have extensive experience. Not in writing wikis I mean. And the other important part of a wiki is having more users around to preserve wiki culture, fact check, and edit articles. So even if someone doesnt want to contribute, give it a read and suggest edits.
 
ZTHorse said:
We are opening up to 15 dedicated writer positions for the wiki. If you have previous wiki writing experience or tech experience, it would be greatly appreciated. If you are interested in helping the zoo community with article writing, please send me a PM.
Click to expand...
Can you elaborate a little why you are limiting the number of authors? The reason why wikis – especially Wikipedia – thrive is that really many, many people contribute. It's basically the wisdom of the masses effect.

It's also the ease of contribution. I've just skimmed over a page and saw an annoying historical error. If I could have edited the wiki, the error would be gone now. I guess you don't make it publicly editable to prevent spam. How about permitting easy edits that only become visible once they have been reviewed though?

I have extensive wiki experience, but unfortunately also wiki trauma. I am tempted to contribute on the one hand, but think it's better for my mental health not to. 😕
 
Very neat. I'd become a writer, but my knowledge is far too narrow, so I'm destined to be a pain in the ass instead. Awesome all the same.
 
Ruben said:
Can you elaborate a little why you are limiting the number of authors? The reason why wikis – especially Wikipedia – thrive is that really many, many people contribute. It's basically the wisdom of the masses effect.

It's also the ease of contribution. I've just skimmed over a page and saw an annoying historical error. If I could have edited the wiki, the error would be gone now. I guess you don't make it publicly editable to prevent spam. How about permitting easy edits that only become visible once they have been reviewed though?

I have extensive wiki experience, but unfortunately also wiki trauma. I am tempted to contribute on the one hand, but think it's better for my mental health not to. 😕
Click to expand...
It was arbitrary. Tbh i havent gotten enough actual experienced zoos who lived in the time periods and enough knowledge to fill the wiki.

Send a message to @Mike The Dog , hes the lead editor.
 
Honestly, yeah, send me a message if you've got a bit of wiki experience and would like to put an edit through every once in a while. Also let me know if you've got ideas for articles and things, because we can always have someone else go through after to insert wikicode.

Talk to ZTHorse if you have any grand ideas! He'd said something about hiring wiki writers, so he might have ideas about specific kinds of content he wants. Once we make some articles, we'd also like to hire artists for it as well.
 
ZTHorse said:
Hey everyone,

As we have heard and understand our position in the zoo community. We have been planning to launch a resource that will document our zoophile history, community, persons, and lifestyle in a format that is better suited to the general public. This initiative has long been planned and now we are ready to put forth the effort, time and cost in managing the official zoophilia wiki page for the whole world.

It is being funded by you whom have been generous, (Thank you Philanthropists) and had the giving spirit to fund ZooVille development. We are using a portion of the donation funds to host this wiki and now we are needing man-power to begin to fill this wiki up with all the knowledge of zoophilia we have.

This resource is a non-pornographic, strickly educational, and documentational wiki for the general public to learn about us.

We are opening up to 15 dedicated writer positions for the wiki. If you have previous wiki writing experience or tech experience, it would be greatly appreciated. If you are interested in helping the zoo community with article writing, please send me a PM.

The wiki is officially open at https://zoophilia.wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page

In deepest love,
ZTHorse

View attachment 107194

Edit; Current writers

@Appa Loosa
@Kynophile
@SigmatoZeta
@Ookami
@ZTHorse
@SteveL from Zeta-Verein
@FloofyNewfie
@underdoge
@DogMichael
@idugavgav
@Equinophile
@LeftFilly
@BojackFR
Click to expand...
:unsure:
 
Do you think that the Zoo wiki should also include a comprehensive animal care section? It seems like the wiki is mostly dedicated to zoo-sexuality and related topics, but caring for your partner is also part of the relationship with a non-human partner, right?

Or is there already an animal care section here on Zooforum?
 
Wolfia said:
No the gay guys can sink your zooship by themselves lol. There needs to be a separation between the "zoo community" and women's bestality & sexuality. The former is completely stupid and the latter has deep archaic and modern significance.
Click to expand...
I'd like to understand your perspective on the deep archaic significance. Can you elaborate?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top