How to discourage behavior?

Hello all. I've been playing with my friends g shep and now he has a habit of moving people's hands towards his cock. This has not pleased my friend, and is wondering how he can discourage this behaviour. Would still like to do this, just when an object is out so he knows that he can do that now but not when the object is not out.
 
Hello all. I've been playing with my friends g shep and now he has a habit of moving people's hands towards his cock. This has not pleased my friend, and is wondering how he can discourage this behaviour. Would still like to do this, just when an object is out so he knows that he can do that now but not when the object is not out.
"How can you discourage this behavior?" Uh duh? By not playing let's touch dicks with your friends dog. The more you enable him, the more he will DEFINITELY seek it out from people. He likes it. The reward centers in his brain are lit up. "Ooooooo that felt good" you know. These exact situations get zoos caught. If you continue with it he will only continue to ask more frequently and your "playtime" could end up getting exposed and sadly nobody is gonna think wow he must've really enjoyed it (the dog) because he asked everyone. They're gonna think wow this guy should be imprisioned because he "broke" my dog. Please think these things through. Don't wanna see another zoo on the news sentenced for something that shouldn't be illegal in the first place. But with that said at least have some respect for your friend. It's not your dog to be intimate with ✌️
 
You can not want a dog to do something and do not want a dog to do the thing at the same time. That would be very confusing. You can stop this behavior by ignoring it long enough. There is a somewhat exponential curve to it. The longer you encourage a behavior the longer it takes to stop it. Since the dog liked it, he might find another way of asking for sex that will be less obvious.
 
Some quick clarifications. 1. Friend is a zoo. 2. He did give me permission to be intimate with his dog, but apparently I did so too many times (only about 6) when he wanted that sort of behavior to only occur when the dog had a visual cue.
 
Some quick clarifications. 1. Friend is a zoo. 2. He did give me permission to be intimate with his dog, but apparently I did so too many times (only about 6) when he wanted that sort of behavior to only occur when the dog had a visual cue.
well, you might try to limit the activity to a specific room. might be easier for the boy to pick up on.
 
Some quick clarifications. 1. Friend is a zoo. 2. He did give me permission to be intimate with his dog, but apparently I did so too many times (only about 6) when he wanted that sort of behavior to only occur when the dog had a visual cue.
If that's the case, I refute my previous response. I wasn't trying to sound crass but situations like that irritate me. There's so many zoos who have got caught fencehopping because they didn't have enough common sense to avoid taking that risk. Anyway your a lucky man to have a friend in rl who is zoo. Not many of us can say the same. Even moreso to find someone who's alright with you basically dating his dog. I mean love is love sometimes a zoo will fall in love with someone else's dog. I get it, it happens. I love that you got the rare opportunity to pursue it and not have to worry or hide your feelings! In a way I'm envious. I raise my glass to you. Cheers! As for advice: You could try and come up with a certain word and say it the next time right before you play. Eventually he'll catch on that when you say that word he's allowed to mount but only if you say it. That may help. Good luck
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Most people I've talked to that fixed the "asking other people for sex problem" only do sexual stuff with their dog partners when they are naked or in a specific room, this is easier for a dog to understand then their human being happy about it sometimes and not happy another time without a large tell.
 
If that's the case, I refute my previous response. I wasn't trying to sound crass but situations like that irritate me. There's so many zoos who have got caught fencehopping because they didn't have enough common sense to avoid taking that risk. Anyway your a lucky man to have a friend in rl who is zoo. Not many of us can say the same. Even moreso to find someone who's alright with you basically dating his dog. I mean love is love sometimes a zoo will fall in love with someone else's dog. I get it, it happens. I love that you got the rare opportunity to pursue it and not have to worry or hide your feelings! In a way I'm envious. I raise my glass to you. Cheers! As for advice: You could try and come up with a certain word and say it the next time right before you play. Eventually he'll catch on that when you say that word he's allowed to mount but only if you say it. That may help. Good luck
using commands is training for sex tho... and it was repeated many many times here why is it a very wrong thing to do. it will sooner or later take away any feedback from the animal. it's on the same level as "use peanut butter". don't give it as an advice, please.
 
using commands is training for sex tho... and it was repeated many many times here why is it a very wrong thing to do. it will sooner or later take away any feedback from the animal. it's on the same level as "use peanut butter". don't give it as an advice, please.
Training animals for sex is wrong. The act must be consensual and ideally initiated by the animal, you must never use any treats, peanut butter, commands, or training methods to make an animal have sex with you or anyone else.
The reasoning behind that is simple, you can teach a dog to let a vet take his blood or trim his nails, clean ears... a clearly unpleasant possibly painful procedure that the dog will endure because there will be a reward in the end.
Bringing this to sex would completely rob you of any valuable feedback and you may end up doing something against the dog's will unknowingly or even worse, knowingly and the dog will withstand that for the reward.
Do not teach animals to have sex with people.
 
Well, I'd think to discourage that behavior do tell him to stop when he's trying it with someone else and if he does reinforce that - maybe with a clicker and a treat -just like you'd do with every other misbehavior. Someone from my neighborhood did just that to get his dog to stop humping me in public while I usually let him do just that while licking my face XD
 
using commands is training for sex tho... and it was repeated many many times here why is it a very wrong thing to do. it will sooner or later take away any feedback from the animal. it's on the same level as "use peanut butter". don't give it as an advice, please.
Dude I wasn't even implying to "command train" him. I'm not suggesting to force anything. I loathe people who think it's alright to try and train an uninterested dog to have sex. They either want it or they don't. But that is not the situation here is it? He's already doing sexual things to begin with of his own free will I'm simply implying to teach a keyword so the dog knows he can play IF HE wants to. Like a question. Similar to do you want something questions! (Like a walk, treat or to be let outside) Damn.

You have to put some sort of guidance into it unless you want your dog trying to fuck everything that walks because they don't understand that's a thing between you and them only. Unless you guys think it's alright that he's asking every visitor that comes around to grope him? What else would you suggest? Since some of you are on your high horse. oooo how the great wise ones have spoken. 🙄 There's no need to be preeminent here. There is scenarios where this type of guidance is necessary.

It's not taking away the animals free will or consent. Said dog can easily turn down the word and show disinterest if they are not in the mood. Like my male for example. He knows the word "handjob". And his response to it varies. He's not trained to respond to it but knows it's his choice how to respond. It's no different from a question. He'll either show interest and mount my arm or leg or not be interested and nothing happens and before anyone makes assumptions that I've "trained" him. My dog doesn't even have sex with me. Thats his choice. He will not and has never mounted me to penetrate, Again his choice! I respect that but he loves to get handjobs and I give him that at least, because it's something he occasionally wants and finds enjoyment in. People need to stop being so quick to jump to Freakin conclusions. Smfh
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Dude I wasn't even implying to "command train" him. I'm not suggesting to force anything. I loathe people who think it's alright to try and train an uninterested dog to have sex. They either want it or they don't. But that is not the situation here is it? He's already doing sexual things to begin with of his own free will I'm simply implying to teach a keyword so the dog knows he can play IF HE wants to. Like a question. Similar to do you want something questions! (Like a walk, treat or to be let outside) Damn. You have to put some sort of guidance into it unless you want your dog trying to fuck everything that walks because they don't understand that's a thing between you and them only. Unless you guys think it's alright that he's asking every visitor that comes around to grope him? What else would you suggest? Since some of you are on your high horse. oooo how the great wise ones have spoken. 🙄 There's no need to be preeminent here. There is scenarios where this type of guidance is necessary. It's not taking away the animals free will or consent. Said dog can easily turn down the word and show disinterest if they are not in the mood. Like my male for example. He knows the word "handjob". And his response to it varies. He's not trained to respond to it but knows it's his choice how to respond. It's no different from a question. He'll either show interest and mount or not be interested and nothing happens and before anyone makes assumptions that I've "trained" him. My dog doesn't even have sex with me. Thats his choice. He will not and has never mounted me to penetrate, Again his choice! I respect that but he loves to get handjobs and I give him that at least, because it's something he occasionally wants and finds enjoyment in. People need to stop being so quick to jump to Freakin conclusions. Smfh
So to clarify that. It wouldn't be "training a dog for sex" but rather asking the dog for permission for a sexual act to happen, not demanding that it *will* happen. Similar to how a human can ask another human "Hey, I'm in the mood right now, how about we bump uglies?" While the recipient of this question can give a verbal "Yes" or "No."

It's the same concept, but it applies to your animal partner. You can ask "Would you like a handjob?" If the dog responds with enthusiasm, then the answer is yes. If the question is met with apathy, then the answer is no. The key here being that you don't ask the dog for a handjob and immediately go grabbing it's dick when the dog has signaled apathy. The dog was given a question, not a command.

I could be wrong here, but I don't see anything harmful about that.
 
So to clarify that. It wouldn't be "training a dog for sex" but rather asking the dog for permission for a sexual act to happen, not demanding that it *will* happen. Similar to how a human can ask another human "Hey, I'm in the mood right now, how about we bump uglies?" While the recipient of this question can give a verbal "Yes" or "No."

It's the same concept, but it applies to your animal partner. You can ask "Would you like a handjob?" If the dog responds with enthusiasm, then the answer is yes. If the question is met with apathy, then the answer is no. The key here being that you don't ask the dog for a handjob and immediately go grabbing it's dick when the dog has signaled apathy. The dog was given a question, not a command.

I could be wrong here, but I don't see anything harmful about that.
Exactly that was all that I was suggesting. The easiest way to discourage it: redirect his behavior from asking others that are nonzoo to play with him like that. When alone verbally ask him if he wants it with the same phrase each time, to start, at first: let's say he trys to pull your hand to his penis, ask him do you want a handjob? Then proceed with a handjob since he was asking for it and showed direct interest. Eventually He will learn with whom it's acceptable to do it with if he is in the mood to do it and that it's acceptable to do it if he's asked.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Dude I wasn't even implying to "command train" him. I'm not suggesting to force anything. I loathe people who think it's alright to try and train an uninterested dog to have sex. They either want it or they don't. But that is not the situation here is it? He's already doing sexual things to begin with of his own free will I'm simply implying to teach a keyword so the dog knows he can play IF HE wants to. Like a question. Similar to do you want something questions! (Like a walk, treat or to be let outside) Damn.

You have to put some sort of guidance into it unless you want your dog trying to fuck everything that walks because they don't understand that's a thing between you and them only. Unless you guys think it's alright that he's asking every visitor that comes around to grope him? What else would you suggest? Since some of you are on your high horse. oooo how the great wise ones have spoken. 🙄 There's no need to be preeminent here. There is scenarios where this type of guidance is necessary.

It's not taking away the animals free will or consent. Said dog can easily turn down the word and show disinterest if they are not in the mood. Like my male for example. He knows the word "handjob". And his response to it varies. He's not trained to respond to it but knows it's his choice how to respond. It's no different from a question. He'll either show interest and mount my arm or leg or not be interested and nothing happens and before anyone makes assumptions that I've "trained" him. My dog doesn't even have sex with me. Thats his choice. He will not and has never mounted me to penetrate, Again his choice! I respect that but he loves to get handjobs and I give him that at least, because it's something he occasionally wants and finds enjoyment in. People need to stop being so quick to jump to Freakin conclusions. Smfh
linking any activity with a spoken word is command training by definition, no matter how you spin it... and i already gave a suggestion, limit the activity to a single room and let the boy pick up on it on his own.

i don't really see why do you see me and others (mind you, that's at least two ppl interpreting your suggestion as teaching the boy a command) pointing out why is using commands bad as "being on a high horse" or "great wise one" or whatever. guess sort of personal attacks are just the bread and butter of retorts here now. make sure to call me an elitist or something in next post (that's a fun one too). i really did thought pretty highly of you....
 
linking any activity with a spoken word is command training by definition, no matter how you spin it... and i already gave a suggestion, limit the activity to a single room and let the boy pick up on it on his own.

i don't really see why do you see me and others (mind you, that's at least two ppl interpreting your suggestion as teaching the boy a command) pointing out why is using commands bad as "being on a high horse" or "great wise one" or whatever. guess sort of personal attacks are just the bread and butter of retorts here now. make sure to call me an elitist or something in next post (that's a fun one too). i really did thought pretty highly of you....
No matter how you spin it, limiting the act to a specific room is showing a dog to only do said act in the bedroom. There's no difference between that and asking a question to make it to where the dog knows when it's acceptable to engage if they want to. I'm saying that it's arrogant to believe that only "one" way is the indefinite right way. As long as the dogs free will and ability to consent is respected what difference does it make how their owner guides them with what's appropriate behavior around guests or the ques they use to ask if their dog is in the mood. That is why I replied the way I did. Don't think highly of me. I'm not above or below anyone else. I'm just here. I exist. I'm here in this community because I'm zoosexual And the whole purpose of this thread was to help the op with an issue. Not to argue with others for answering with possible solutions to it 👍
 
Last edited by a moderator:
No matter how you spin it, limiting the act to a specific room is showing a dog to only do said act in the bedroom. There's no difference between that and asking a question to make it to where the dog knows when it's acceptable to engage if they want to. I'm saying that it's arrogant to believe that only "one" way is the indefinite right way. As long as the dogs free will and ability to consent is respected what difference does it make how their owner guides them with what's appropriate behavior around guests or the ques they use to ask if their dog is in the mood. That is why I replied the way I did. Don't think highly of me. I'm not above or below anyone else. I'm just here. I exist. I'm here in this community because I'm zoosexual And the whole purpose of this thread was to help the op with an issue. Not to argue with others for answering with possible solutions to it 👍
Also you gotta keep in mind that definitions don't always correlate to every scenario of an instance. What you see as "training" others would see as just a mere simple question to guide the dog into knowing when said behavior is invited or not if he's in the mood. It's in no way a command. The dogs given the choice to respond however he wants.

For example when it comes to the first sentence in this response take the definition of zoophilia into account "the sexual attraction to non-human animals" a zoophile is defined as "a individual who is attracted to non-human animals" and in a literal sense zoo translates to "Animal" philla to "love" yet not every zoo has engaged in actual sex acts with animals, I've even seen instances of individuals wanting to suppress said attraction because they would rather be 'normal' I'm sure you have aswell, not to mention the ones who wouldn't participate but like to watch (whether porn or in person) also take note that not every animal lover on the planet is zoosexual.

You can't paint a scenario with a definite reasoning all the time based solely on one point. There's always factors involved. This entire reality is built upon paradoxes. Arrogancy is being too closeminded in your views to understand others. Arrogancy is "but this is my way your way is wrong" even when there's nothing inherintly wrong about it. With that said I'm done commenting here. I've said what I felt needed to be said
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top