Fake cum and rules

Forbid fake cum?

  • Total voters
    49
  • Poll closed .
pes

pes

Moderator
Staff member
I did a quick search through the rules here:

[ZOOVILLE RULES]

Welcome to ZooVille! Thanks for making Zooville your home! We welcome everyone that's presently a zoo, curious, or just trying to get their foot in the water! We currently have our list of guidelines that everyone needs to follow. !!!!ATTENTION!!!! AS STATED FROM THE TERMS AND POLICY POST THAT...
www.zoovilleforum.com www.zoovilleforum.com
And did not find any mention of fake cum. If it is hidden there somewhere, please point it out for me.

After yesterday's experience I would like to suggest adding a rule against posting obviously fake cum porn. It is not that hard to identify fake dog cum or fake horse cum (mostly in commercial crap zoo porn). I would say most experienced zoos know what these things should look like.
I am not asking for banning the user who posted that, just for removal of the content and a friendly reminder of what the real cum shot and behavior of the animal should look like. You can use semen collection videos from youtube to show that.

I think it is reasonable to think that most users here do not want to see fake cum for the obvious reasons that it is insincere, fake and misleading.

What do you think?

Additional clarifications:
pes said:
To clarify I am not asking for making posting of fake cum porn a violation of rules that must end in a ban of the user. The user may not actually know what the real thing looks like and just needs to be shown or told.

But I want the rules to state that fake cum porn will be removed and the user will be reminded not to post such content.
This would basically make it possible for us to report fake cum and have it removed from the website which is not possible with the current rules.
Click to expand...

pes said:
I consider the poll to be secondary in the decision process here. It is more just a quick representation of the opinion in the thread.

Because this poll is not about what people want to see in porn. If it was, then it is very very likely that fake porn would overwhelmingly win. Because it come with the "supposedly" beautiful and definitely not underpaid, forced women actors which is what the majority of users here do want to see no matter what the cum looks like.

The question here is whether supporting fake porn and all the nasty stuff that comes with it on a zoo forum is moral and right to do or not.
Click to expand...

ZTHorse said:
Ive looked over the thread and believe although fake cum is cheesy and distasteful, it is allowed so long as the animal involved isnt drugged or abused.

Alot of fake horse cum shots are just the actoress holding a tube on the side of his cock while someone presses an injector to spray lube around.

Its cheesy and distastful but it isnt harming the animals involved.

It is allowed.
Click to expand...

As a result:
pes said:
I expected a result like this unfortunately.
So I am going to ask everybody here who wishes not to see fake cum to do this if you see one:
1. Kindly remind the author of the thread to not post fake porn and explain the difference to them. Use youtube semen collection videos to prove your point.
2. Report the thread. While moderators will not likely be able to remove it because of the fake cum itself, another pair of eyes may spot something else wrong with the video an remove it as a result. Also if a higher authority like a mod explains what fake cum is to the author, it may have greater effect.

Considering that fake cum does not get posted very often anyway, this is not going to add unimaginable amounts of extra work for the mods in any way, but it is going to make them aware in the process.
Thanks.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
I think it should be bannable only if the animal is sedated, held down, or uncomfortable. As disgusting as it is there should be a warning to let people know that its a fake cum video if the dog isnt harmed in any way
 
Hmm... this should be interesting should this thread take off. I know I've inquired about removing the crappy porn involving women and limp semi-erect horse commercial crap. Since they make me very uncomfortable. But I was told that it falls under gray matter porn. I can remove the content if the horse is visibly drugged. Which means it's staggering around, unbalanced, disoriented, or it's head is down with a drooping lower lip and their eyes are half way closed.

But you are correct, there is no current rule that forbids fake cum videos. Only abuse and/or drugged animals.
 
FloofyNewfie said:
Hmm... this should be interesting should this thread take off. I know I've inquired about removing the crappy porn involving women and limp semi-erect horse commercial crap. Since they make me very uncomfortable. But I was told that it falls under gray matter porn. I can remove the content if the horse is visibly drugged. Which means it's staggering around, unbalanced, disoriented, or it's head is down with a drooping lower lip and their eyes are half way closed.

But you are correct, there is no current rule that forbids fake cum videos. Only abuse and/or drugged animals.
Click to expand...
Cant you require a warning that fake cum is involved before you post, kinda like discord spoilers?
 
Doggo lover said:
Cant you require a warning that fake cum is involved before you post, kinda like discord spoilers?
Click to expand...
We could try and enforce that rule, but the main problem is that most people don't even know the difference between fake and real cum and don't even bother to research the difference in the first place. To them it's simply wank material. Most people don't tag their uploaded porn anyways. Once upon a time there wasn't separated M/F, F/M, T/F, and T/M categories. It was all lumped together in a general "porn" section.
 
FloofyNewfie said:
We could try and enforce that rule, but the main problem is that most people don't even know the difference between fake and real cum and don't even bother to research the difference in the first place. To them it's simply wank material. Most people don't tag their uploaded porn anyways. Once upon a time there wasn't separated M/F, F/M, T/F, and T/M categories. It was all lumped together in a general "porn" section.
Click to expand...
Huh, well maybe i should male a thread dedicated to what real animal cum looks like so people can learn the difference
 
Wasbitchpolly said:
Just don’t watch it......easy
Click to expand...

You probably didn't see what happened here, yesterday.

A single user posted multiple threads with typical crappy commercial zoo porn with buckets of fake cum, claiming it to be real.
When it was pointed out that the cum was obviously fake, that user attacked experienced users over it, claiming they don't know what real cum looks like, and how the yogurt / milk is obviously real...

"Don't watch" doesn't solve anything. You'll just get more people believing that's what an ejaculating horse / dog looks like.

Educate, and enforce if necessary.

I'm 1000% in favor of removing the obviously fake crap. Imo, the "drugged horse" rule can easily be made to include "Cumshots from floppy dicks", as that's a very clear indication the stallion is drugged...
 
As boring, and often even disgusting these, mostly Brazil, fake cum horseporn is, the wast majority of "I wank to zooporn" guys do not see the difference, or do not care.

Most people joining this forum are very shallow people. That's why 8/10 of the introductions are "iam m, sexy, big dick, like to watch girls screw animals". But I get sidetracked.

Voted yes, allthougth it would be hard to enforce.
 
Bloit said:
You probably didn't see what happened here, yesterday.

A single user posted multiple threads with typical crappy commercial zoo porn with buckets of fake cum, claiming it to be real.
When it was pointed out that the cum was obviously fake, that user attacked experienced users over it, claiming they don't know what real cum looks like, and how the yogurt / milk is obviously real...

"Don't watch" doesn't solve anything. You'll just get more people believing that's what an ejaculating horse / dog looks like.

Educate, and enforce if necessary.

I'm 1000% in favor of removing the obviously fake crap. Imo, the "drugged horse" rule can easily be made to include "Cumshots from floppy dicks", as that's a very clear indication the stallion is drugged...
Click to expand...
I personally don’t watch the porn as I find it contrived and unreal but if everyone stopped watching it it would eventually go away but most men on here don’t give a toss if it’s genuine or not just as long as they get a wank out of it
 
Bloit said:
"Don't watch" doesn't solve anything. You'll just get more people believing that's what an ejaculating horse / dog looks like.

Educate, and enforce if necessary.
Click to expand...
This exactly is the reason for the proposed rule. Plus praising and encouraging bad fake porn (which is often abusive) perpetuates the wrong idea of what good zoo porn is. It is giving power to careless commercial porn producers and spreading misconceptions about zoophilia.

You can already report abusive videos (that often contain fake cum) for being abusive. That rule is already here.
The proposed rule does not need to end in a ban as long as the content is not abusive. The purpose of it is to clean up the disgusting fake porn, educate people and prevent fake porn from being accessible. And as a result save some database hard drive space. :D
 
To clarify I am not asking for making posting of fake cum porn a violation of rules that must end in a ban of the user. The user may not actually know what the real thing looks like and just needs to be shown or told.

But I want the rules to state that fake cum porn will be removed and the user will be reminded not to post such content.
This would basically make it possible for us to report fake cum and have it removed from the website which is not possible with the current rules.
 
It's not a bad idea, or at least flagging such content. If nothing else, using fake cum in porn is just a mislead, sharing this desinformation to more kinksters who then see animals cartoonishly rather than realisticaly. Maybe the forum should be educational, rather than a land of fantasy. I understand the appeal of gallons of thick white semen for some people, but the problem is when it is served as reality. Same goes for other behavior in porn, such as humans grabbing inflated dog penis with it's thin skin and using it roughly as a dildo, that's just not how things work...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Most of Brazilian horse porn uses fake cum.
Most are rubbish buy I've seen a few good ones with real cum mixed amongst the crap ones, in the same video.
Id say keep it, leave it to the community to inform others it's fake.
 
staffi said:
I would rather forbid non-homemade content on the site.(Or make it a subsection) If you make a video and you do it with fake cum well atleast you did some new content. But I cant even go into the womans with animals section because it's nothing but commercial zoo porn. Hard to find OG content there.
Click to expand...
I'd suggest making a homemade content section, and forbidding fake cum there.
Dildogging is not too far off fake cum in fakeness scale, yet most commercial porn does it. I'd ban this in homemade section too.
 
Wasbitchpolly said:
Just don’t watch it......easy
Click to expand...

"Don't like don't look" is a quick one way ride to the further degeneration of this forum.
Might as well allow scat, "just don't look lol".

Spawn86 said:
I'd suggest making a homemade content section, and forbidding fake cum there.
Dildogging is not too far off fake cum in fakeness scale, yet most commercial porn does it. I'd ban this in homemade section too.
Click to expand...

I'd rather see dildogging and anal banned alltogether.
 
I am quite surprised to see that according to the poll, 3 people want to watch fake cum. :D Are there any admins to comment on this topic?
 
Personally, I hate seeing fake cumshots. It turns me off, consequently I don't look at too much porn. It's such a shame that so much is fake, there are some beautiful girls in horse porn and while it starts in a spectacular (I mean it literally) way it just degenerates into th eusual fake cumshot and spoils it. It's the same for dog porn, for me, coupled with forced dildogging, especially when the dog is either dopey or not interested. I much prefer amateur or real sex.
I don't see how you can put a rule in place warning of fake cum though, mores the pity!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top