Considering the amount of yiff with them yes there are.I no offense… please…
They peoples into the dinosaurs ?… jus curious …
I look up the “yiff”… sooo much the English slang… thnx uConsidering the amount of yiff with them yes there are.
I look up the “yiff”… sooo much the English slang… thnx u
This is a fun post. Not a scientific discussion. Of course there are species with and without feathers or partially feathered, or species with something in between of feathers and something else or species with proto-feathers.
Now I personally grew up on featherless dinos and already loved them and now I love the fluffy ones even more.
View attachment 331894
Not that bad in my opinion.
I don’t know about calling them attractive but I find dinosaurs to look way more COOL without feathers.Regardless of scientific evidence.
Which version of dinosaurs do you find more attractive?
View attachment 331856
View attachment 331857
Behold, the BaroqueasaurusThis is a fun post. Not a scientific discussion. Of course there are species with and without feathers or partially feathered, or species with something in between of feathers and something else or species with proto-feathers.
Now I personally grew up on featherless dinos and already loved them and now I love the fluffy ones even more.
View attachment 331894
Not that bad in my opinion.
A modern Pterosaurus has no feathers.Just be glad that we discovered all the dinosaurs hundreds of years ago. Could you imagine what we'd call them if we had discovered them a couple of years ago?
Instead of "Tyrannosaurus Rex" we'd have called them something like "Heckin' Chonkosaurus" or some crap!