Are men inferior to dogs sexually?

Brass

Lurker
it's exactly as the title asks, do you (women and gay/bi men) consider sex with male dogs to be universally better than sex with human males? if so is there anything to ever close the gap or do you consider the difference in physiology too greatly in favor of dogs.

this is for research so explanations instead of stories would be nice, please document your experience without trying to make it written porn for ease of compiling. if you could state whether you are a woman or gay/bi male would also help. your level of experience with both would also help. Example: "I've had sex with x amount of men/dogs" and/or "I've been having sex with men/dogs for x amount of years". notes of what you prefer physically and emotionally about both types of partners would be greatly appreciated. this isn't going on YouTube or in an article, I intend to show the results here in another thread if this one gets enough appropriate responses.

please refrain from making up stories, or commenting if you've only experienced one type of partner, or neither for that matter
 

Attachments

  • R.jpg
    R.jpg
    39.8 KB · Views: 37
I consider myself Bi but prefer other female partners I'm also quite submissive as well as having a very high sex drive, for me the act of intercourse with a dog exceeds anything I have experienced with a male partner, very possible that my previous male lovers have been a little lacking or selfish, or perhaps I expected to much, but as far as being satisfied sexually and experiencing that feeling of total domination once I get past the feeling of guilt and humiliation, submitting to a K9 lover is for me the ultimate experience for intercourse, out side of that I am more than content to submit to the wishes of another female lover.
 
These comparisons make me laugh.
I really can’t say what would be better, as I’m a giver, not a taker. And that goes towards orgasms as well. But, what I can say is I don’t get off if she’s not getting off. I like hearing her moan, feeling her muscles tense up, and watching her lose control.
Many guys are pretty self centered when it comes to sex, and many woman can be too... ever heard the term mattress back? Lol.
Dogs aren’t trying to give you an orgasm, they’re trying to breed, spread the seed. It’s nature. Sure they lick to no end too, but once again, it’s because it tastes good to them, not because you haven’t came yet... They also just fuck wildly for an undetermined amount of time, be it 5 seconds or a minute, and then just stand there, leaving the rest to whoever there in. Everyone has kinks too, and some get off at the thought of Fucking a dog, which in turn makes the sex better also.
Want good sex, find someone who sees eye to eye with you, and maybe include the
 
Both are "inferior" to each other because its the same textures for generation after generation ofc trying a new species is gonna spice up sensations since both taboo/outta the same species textures.

So no one is inferior its simply perspective
 
Tried here a little essay based on mostly the experiences of other, but also a few o my own.


Pros and cons of humans:

Pros: Mental: Awareness of sexual needs and the ability to learn limitless techniques. Potential duration of intercourse extremely long. Potential for controlling sensations and adjusting for partner. Ability to mentally understand the context of a sex act and to stimulate excitement in a partner. Physical: Men have relatively large sex organs, and women have clearly visible sexual charachteristics. Humans dont have estrus or other significant hormone cycles limiting sex activity.

Cons: Physically: If uneducated and unexperienced sexually, a human is not an impressive partner. Men tend to quick orgasming and take a longer time for repeat performance. Women tend to take a long time to build up excitement and therefore are not readily available for intercourse, although hormone cycles are not much of a factor. I repeat, if uneducated sexually. Also pregnancy is likely and has to be avoided actively.
Mentally: Humans have a huge communication factor, and the emotional and social weight of sexuality is a downer for many. Boths sexes suffer and sometimes encourage performance anxiety. Failed (unilateral or unpleasurable) physical sexuality often goes uncorrected for mental or social reasons.

Pros and cons of dogs:

Pros: Mentally: The connection of dogs to sexuality is instinctive, and their readiness is only limited by bad experiences only in rare cases. They are therefore in the ready to initiate regardless of special hormonal factors, specially males. Females require more habituation, as they have strong hormone cycles, but will initiate if educated sexually. Their animal nature excludes abuse, manipulation or judgement of sex partner.
Physically: Males have sex organs of a compatible size and configuration that is exciting to humans, as is the apparently boundless availability of male dogs. A tie will prolong the act with a woman, be it for a few minutes to almost half an hour. Their ejaculation is prolonged. They have more ability for short term repeat activity. Females have vaginas that are tight for physiological reasons, and when interspecies act is achieved, produces pleasureable sensation for both. Interspecies pregnancy not a factor.

Cons: Physically: in the case of males, the thrusting part of the sex act lasts a few second only. The tie can sometimes be painful with large breeds in interspecies. Training for a completely satisfying experience sometimes requires patience for profficiency. In the case of females, first interspecies experiences are sometimes failed due to the size of human penis. Training and patience required. Female dogs have few visible sexual characteristics.
Mentally: The inability for mental (abstract) arousal requires much behavioral training. Communication of arousal of an abstract nature is impossible.
 
That’s a really interesting summery. I am active with both humans and canines…(not at the same time!)…and each has its appeal and each ‘speak’ to me in a certain way that I love.

my German Shepard is totally different than any man and makes me feel different and I love it, but I also love the way a man can make me feel.

that is why it is so hard to label or make certain comments like this is better than that. Everything is different and it is up to us to decide what we like
 
For a lot of people I imagine this is like which do you love more, your favourite movie or your favourite song? They can both be good depending on who you ask.

I may be an exception in that I’m not really attracted to men to begin with but if I had to choose between a human woman lover and a male canine lover, I’d have to give a similar answer in that they’re both good for different reasons and I wouldn’t say one is overall better than the other.
 
The question can not be answered. Try to come up with a definition of sexual inferiority. Particularly as sex for humans is such a mental thing. And this thread documents this very well - it is down to personal preference of the human.
 
To me it's like comparing two kinds of food that you equally like, trying to figure out which is better. You just sometimes want one thing and sometimes a different one. There are pleasing moments dogs can't deliver, as well as are some kinds of pleasure you can never have with a human male
 
To me it's like comparing two kinds of food that you equally like, trying to figure out which is better. You just sometimes want one thing and sometimes a different one. There are pleasing moments dogs can't deliver, as well as are some kinds of pleasure you can never have with a human male
As long as food is concerned, pizza will always be my favourite 😂
 
We really shouldn't be playing with fire like this. However, since we are let's begin. Would a k9 or another type of animal be more pleasurable than a human male? Probably yes. Would a different specie of female be better than a human woman? Hell yes.
 
We really shouldn't be playing with fire like this. However, since we are let's begin. Would a k9 or another type of animal be more pleasurable than a human male? Probably yes. Would a different specie of female be better than a human woman? Hell yes.
How tho? I can’t fully compare the woman side of things, as I’ve never had sex with a female dog, but I can say I’ve had some very giving girlfriends, and I can’t see any dog ever matching up to that. I believe that goes kind of the same towards the male side also.
 
I feel that in the right circumstances a dog and man can compliment each other in making a woman extremely happy and sexually satisfied as we both have different things to offer her, however when it comes to the raw sex i am willing to accept that i am inferior to my 4 legged mate, that part is definitely he's domain ;)
It is true that there are some of us men still out there who love to please women, in fact nothing turns me on more.
 
As a straight male I would like to toss in my opinion here and side with dogs. I believe that most humans are inferior to canines and most other species fur that matter in general. Sexually, canids have got the upper paw on men in some ways. But I don't think this is the way to approach the subject. Humans and canines have their strengths and weaknesses when it comes to lovemaking. If you pick the right guy to join your pack who's got the right mindset in regard to his place in the polygamous relationship, that of being an equal with the canine partner instead of a feeling of competitiveness or superiority, and being an extra person to bring that much more joy into the dog's life and their person's life, then it's no longer about who's better at what. Because in the end it's just more love and happiness to go around between all of us. 😘🐾
 
Back
Top