SigmaTheZeta
Esteemed Citizen of ZV
There is a traditional culture centered around dog shows, competitions, and champion breeds, and this got me thinking.
If you were a zoosexual and you had a dog that was particularly sexually attracted to both male and female humans and has lots of other traits that are good to have in a canine sexual companion (like being able to listen to the words "not right now" and understand them), then your dog would have a number of qualities that make for a very good sexual companion for a human.
Now, what if us zoosexuals were to select a constellation of existing breeds, and we started breeding them specifically for these kinds of traits? Out of any given litter, we could just breed only the dogs from that litter that showed the most sexual interest in us and also had the best manners about their sexuality with us. Those of us that were women could also choose for family relationship related traits such as good fatherhood related behaviors toward human children. You wouldn't want to breed a dog that would mount a child, but you would want to breed a dog that would readily intercept a child from running out into the road.
This would only be really viable for zoos that have homes large enough to be comfortable as multi-dog households, but if some zoosexuals are affluent enough to own horses, then I am sure that some zoosexuals are affluent enough to do something like this.
I realize that some people, including some zoophiles, are anti-breeding, but I don't think that it's fair to tar all intentional breeding of dogs with the same brush. That's like the Humane Society pushing state legislatures to believe that all zoophiles are people that sexually mutilate their animals, based on a few incidents that happened to get reported to them. They only saw the ugliest of us, and they concluded that all of us were ugly. They showed some scary-looking pictures to some gullible legislatures, and they have now gotten the whole world convinced that we're a bunch of soulless, ravenous monsters. What's happening to us, right now, is what happens when you tar any given group of people with the same brush. I think that some intentional breeding is actually not only pardonable but actually a good idea. Just because some people tend to sell their dogs to owners that have questionable motives, that doesn't mean that all breeders everywhere are this irresponsible. I think that there are many breeders that do extensive background checks on prospective owners and actually do interviews to figure out what kinds of homes their babies are going to, and I agree with this. I think that just selling a puppy to the highest bidder is insanity, and many other breeders also believe that it's insanity. If I ever have another dog in the future, I would really prefer to get my dog from a breeder that took precautions.
I also think that we could, in the future, consider asking for special legislation, to allow dogs that were intentionally bred for sex to be excluded from anti-bestiality laws. If it is known and demonstrably true that our particular breeds are not just perfectly willing as lovers but also exceptionally good at it, then it would be very difficult to portray us as people that are forcing our animals to do something against their will. A breed that is known for taking immense, proactive enjoyment in having sex with humans could not reasonably be portrayed as victims. That might be a couple of generations down the road, but I think it's something that could enter discussions if we could successfully establish a breed that makes for good sexual companionship.
If you were a zoosexual and you had a dog that was particularly sexually attracted to both male and female humans and has lots of other traits that are good to have in a canine sexual companion (like being able to listen to the words "not right now" and understand them), then your dog would have a number of qualities that make for a very good sexual companion for a human.
Now, what if us zoosexuals were to select a constellation of existing breeds, and we started breeding them specifically for these kinds of traits? Out of any given litter, we could just breed only the dogs from that litter that showed the most sexual interest in us and also had the best manners about their sexuality with us. Those of us that were women could also choose for family relationship related traits such as good fatherhood related behaviors toward human children. You wouldn't want to breed a dog that would mount a child, but you would want to breed a dog that would readily intercept a child from running out into the road.
This would only be really viable for zoos that have homes large enough to be comfortable as multi-dog households, but if some zoosexuals are affluent enough to own horses, then I am sure that some zoosexuals are affluent enough to do something like this.
I realize that some people, including some zoophiles, are anti-breeding, but I don't think that it's fair to tar all intentional breeding of dogs with the same brush. That's like the Humane Society pushing state legislatures to believe that all zoophiles are people that sexually mutilate their animals, based on a few incidents that happened to get reported to them. They only saw the ugliest of us, and they concluded that all of us were ugly. They showed some scary-looking pictures to some gullible legislatures, and they have now gotten the whole world convinced that we're a bunch of soulless, ravenous monsters. What's happening to us, right now, is what happens when you tar any given group of people with the same brush. I think that some intentional breeding is actually not only pardonable but actually a good idea. Just because some people tend to sell their dogs to owners that have questionable motives, that doesn't mean that all breeders everywhere are this irresponsible. I think that there are many breeders that do extensive background checks on prospective owners and actually do interviews to figure out what kinds of homes their babies are going to, and I agree with this. I think that just selling a puppy to the highest bidder is insanity, and many other breeders also believe that it's insanity. If I ever have another dog in the future, I would really prefer to get my dog from a breeder that took precautions.
I also think that we could, in the future, consider asking for special legislation, to allow dogs that were intentionally bred for sex to be excluded from anti-bestiality laws. If it is known and demonstrably true that our particular breeds are not just perfectly willing as lovers but also exceptionally good at it, then it would be very difficult to portray us as people that are forcing our animals to do something against their will. A breed that is known for taking immense, proactive enjoyment in having sex with humans could not reasonably be portrayed as victims. That might be a couple of generations down the road, but I think it's something that could enter discussions if we could successfully establish a breed that makes for good sexual companionship.
Last edited: