• Suddenly unable to log into your ZooVille account? This might be the reason why: CLICK HERE!

Dantezoo5

Tourist
BANNED USER
Hello, do you not think that there is a double standard when a woman has sex with a dog, what if a man is the one who fuck a dog? I would even say that this double standard is for Zoogay if it is the man who receives and not the other way around. I saw this a lot in the news when they cross out the rapist man if he does it with bitches, but if it is a woman who does it, then they call it "strange.". I also saw the same thing about mythology as if a woman does it, it is painted as "romantic" (see Leda and the swan), but if a man does it, it is lustful (satiros).

Even notice that, on behalf of other hypocritical zoos, they say that if a woman does it, it is not mistreatment, but if a man does it, then it is rape, even though they fuck bitches. What do I know? it is something that I simply find unfair and that I wanted to share with you.
 
Su observación es correcta.
También verás personas expresando opiniones similares en el foro.
En términos generales se puede simplificar así: "Si me gusta el porno, está bien".
Excepto aquellos casos en que la pornografía también sea maltrato animal, en cuyo caso esto no aplica.
Thanks
 
Welcome to life.

Ignore the idiots, rub it in their face and move on. can't fix people and their retarded double standards.

I just go into detail of how amazing boffing the sheep are or lovely my woofy girls tail hole is to work em up more, only satisfaction you will get is imagining them blowing blood vessels in their head in impotent rage.
 
The Internet is saturated with zoo content from women, but there is not so much zoo content from men with bitches.
 
There are none more judgmental then our own fellow zoo's .

Some of the women on the site have been quoted as saying it is unnatural for men and male dogs to mate in any form. I was "chocked" when the topic came up in the chat room.

But then I realized how much I didn't care for their opinions.
 
They can stick their uninformed opinions where the sun don't shine, I've heard the tired old BS that female animals can't consent from women, gay men and general fetishists for so long now the only thing I think of is how much they remind me of a annoying little dog yapping all the time.
 
This definitely extends beyond zoo content or even porn... think about the headlines when a woman teacher "has sex with" her students vs when a male teacher "rapes" one of his. I think part of it is how sexualized women are in general. When we are view as sexual objects or "a set of holes" it would only be natural for us to get fucked by dogs. A lot of people think it's degrading, and like to see women as things vs men.
 
There are none more judgmental then our own fellow zoo's .

Some of the women on the site have been quoted as saying it is unnatural for men and male dogs to mate in any form. I was "chocked" when the topic came up in the chat room.

But then I realized how much I didn't care for their opinions.
Then when you dare to say no, the next comment will be "we should check your HDD, there must be "interesting" content in it!!44!!" She was gifted me with this sentence half a year ago.
This implies that you or me are an animal abuser... :rolleyes:

They can stick their uninformed opinions where the sun don't shine, I've heard the tired old BS that female animals can't consent from women, gay men and general fetishists for so long now the only thing I think of is how much they remind me of a annoying little dog yapping all the time.
It should be written into the rules, similar to the KYS rule, that if someone is called a rapist, abuser or pedo etc. words of great weight without any evidence of this, just because they hate you or of the method of penetration (M/M, M/F), then the user should be banned for 3 weeks.
I have ignored at least 10 users in the past because they called me a rapist, because I wrote that not all male dogs sex are anal abusers.

If no one can write the phrase KYS, not even in DF, then neither can abuser and words of great weight without any evidence of this.
This is a completely logical rule addition.
 
This definitely extends beyond zoo content or even porn... think about the headlines when a woman teacher "has sex with" her students vs when a male teacher "rapes" one of his. I think part of it is how sexualized women are in general. When we are view as sexual objects or "a set of holes" it would only be natural for us to get fucked by dogs. A lot of people think it's degrading, and like to see women as things vs men.
It's true that when a male teacher does the same thing to a female student, it's called rape, but there are many cases of female teachers abusing young men because it's undeniable that they're in a position of power as well. Many people mock Macron for his wife, and that's a serious issue.
I don't think I'm going down the "sex object" route because I also mentioned the myth of Leda and the swan, comparing it to the myth of the satyr and the goat, which is just as widespread, except that the satyr has a more negative connotation. I'm saying that culture and norms demand that men limit their sexual desires, which is unfair because the same isn't asked of women...
 
But the same thing is in reverse, I work in an old-school boys-club industry and a woman climbing into senior management would NEVER happen unless she has family connections or somehow has leverage. That's just how it is.
 
Back
Top